Archive 2012 | |
Archive 2011 | |
Archive 2010 | |
Archive 2009 | |
Archive 2008 | |
Archive 2007 | |
Archive 2006 | |
Archive 2005 | |
Archive 2004 | |
Archive 2003 |
George
Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and
Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C. His column, "The Catholic
Difference," is syndicated by the
Denver Catholic Register, official newspaper of the Archdiocese of
Denver. Click here to read his
biography.
|
Subscribe Today! |
9/11, Benedict XVI and Regensburg Sept. 28, 2011 - In the flood of
commentary surrounding the 10th anniversary of 9/11, I found but one
reference to a related anniversary of considerable importance: the fifth
anniversary of Pope Benedict XVI’s Regensburg Lecture. That lecture, given
the day after the fifth anniversary of 9/11 at the pope’s old university
in Germany, identified the two key challenges to 21st-century Islam, if
that faith of over a billion people is going to live within today’s world
in something other than a condition of war. On the fifth anniversary of
Regensburg, therefore, it’s worth reviewing what the pope proposed, not
least because the 9/11 anniversary commentary assiduously avoided the
question that the Holy Father courageously confronted: the question of
what-must-change in Islam in the future, to prevent an ongoing global war
of Islam-against-the-rest. Islam, he suggested, must find a way to affirm religious freedom as a fundamental human right that can be known by reason and that includes the right to change one’s religion—and it must find this “way” from within its own religious, legal, philosophical and theological resources. The question is not one of surrender to certain secularist conceptions of public life, any more than it was when Catholicism confronted political modernity and found a solution in the Second Vatican Council’s Declaration on Religious Freedom. The solution has to come from within, in what Christian theology would call a “development of doctrine.” Secondly, Islam must find a way—again, from within its own religious and intellectual resources—to affirm a distinction between religious and political authority in a just state. This need not and indeed cannot mean a radical “wall of separation” between the two, based on some (mis)conceptions of the American constitutional order. It might mean something like what the Catholic Church did during the late 20th century, when Catholic scholars reached back into the fifth century and rediscovered a traditional distinction between priestly and imperial authority: a tradition whose deepest roots go back to the Lord’s own distinction between what is owed to Caesar and what is owed to God (Mt 15:21). Despite their being largely ignored during the 9/11 anniversary, these do seem to be the two key issues. An Islam that affirms religious freedom, including conversion from one faith to another, and that buttresses that affirmation through its own religious self-understanding and the arts of reason, is an Islam with which “the rest” can live at ease, and in enriching ways. An Islam in which religious and political authority are distinct, if related, is an Islam in which a genuinely civil society can begin to take root—and a robust civil society is one barrier against the corrupt authoritarianism that has bedeviled Islamic countries for centuries. A robust civil society in which there is room for religious freedom and multiple political perspectives is also essential to realizing the promise of today’s “Arab Spring”—which could give birth to a hot summer and a bitter winter if its chief accomplishment is to effect a change from secular political authoritarianism to religiously-warranted political authoritarianism. What hit the United States on 9/11 was not a “tragedy,” despite the ubiquitous and virtually universal misuse of that word in the 10th—anniversary commentary. What hit New York and Washington was evil unleashed from within an intra-Islamic civil war that had been going on for decades. And at the center of that civil war is a contest over whether Islam can embrace such modern political ideas as inalienable human rights (that can be known by reason, and thus by everyone) and the separation of powers within governments. If the answer to that question is “No,” then the cycle of war between Islam and “the rest” that has ebbed and flowed since the seventh-century will continue. If the answer is “yes,” then that answer will have to come from within Islam, not by a process in which Islamic societies radically secularize. Pope Benedict XVI was insightful enough, and courageous enough, to say this at Regensburg. It’s about time the world paid attention. George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C. Weigel’s column is distributed by the Denver Catholic Register, the official newspaper of the Archdiocese of Denver. Phone: 303-715-3215. To access the complete archive of his columns, please visit www.archden.org/weigel. |
Latest
Columns Books
ATTENTION EDITORS!! Subscribe today! For only $20 per column (or $10 for online-only publication), you, too, can publish George Weigel’s weekly column in your newspaper, bulletin or journal. For more information, contact Tracy Murphy, Associate Director of Communications for the Archdiocese of Denver, at tracy.murphy@archden.org.
|
|